"Conservatives simply do not understand the enemy they face. Conservatives, as a group, are good, honest, decent people who see government as a means to protect their obvious rights as they go about earning a living and raising their children. The idea that there are forces which would deliberately set out to subvert our way of life, even to the point of stealing elections, just doesn't 'compute' in the conservative mind. Many people tend to judge another person's motives based on their own set of moral standards. Conservatives believe in fair play. They believe in compromise and consideration of the other side's ideas. They look for a way down the middle. They simply don't understand a political force that would institute a 'scorched earth' policy to destroy the very system it is trying to lead. Power for power's sake is not the conservative ideal."Simply put, the fundamental difference between conservatives and liberals is that one group believes in the rule of law to protect liberty, regardless of the personal consequences, while the other believes in the rule of man -- the easy manipulation of the emotional plea to 'just do something now for the sake of the people.' Consequently, conservatives find themselves out maneuvered and hopelessly boxed in by preposterous sound-bite proposals and positions any 'reasonable' individual should simply dismiss as folly. Instead, with our world turned upside down, we are now told to call these absurdities 'our democracy,' The truth is, civilized society cannot survive the chaos of rule without laws." -- From "'Bipartisanship' Is a Liberal Trap," by Tom DeWeese, Insider's Report, December 2000, page 2, published by the American Policy Center, 13873 Park Center Road, #316, Herndon, Virginia 20171. Phone: 703-925-0881. Fax: 703-925-0991. E-mail. Website. Posted here: 12-18-00.
"Republicans believe so strongly in the power and force of law that they spend most of their time arguing against new laws -- on the grounds that laws limit freedom in absolute ways and that there has to be a very good reason to impose such limits. The Democratic Party is the party of fairness. Laws are to be followed to the letter only if they are fair. If they're not, they are to be ignored or bent -- or blurred by judicial intervention. That's why Democrats have no problem passing new laws or arguing against the language of statutes that seem unfair to them They consider law not an end in itself, but rather a framework for further discussion. Though we've been talking about the post-election fracas as a struggle between Democrats and Republicans, this really is a struggle between two worldviews -- the conservative worldview and the liberal worldview. . . . The results of [the Florida Supreme Court] decision and the election's final outcome are going to usher in a period of protracted and pronounced philosophical division the likes of which we have not seen in many generations."-- New York Post columnist John Podhoretz, as quoted in "Two Worldviews," Inside Politics, The Washington Times National Weekly Edition, November 27-December 3, 2000, page 16. Address: 3600 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20002. E-mail. Website. Posted here: 12-11-00.
[I have excerpted below highlighted sections of the election fraud article found elsewhere on my website. What this article tells me is that corruption, perpetrated by Democrats, is so massive in Palm Beach County and probably other key counties around the country, that the election process in America has been crippled. Who knows how many elections have been stolen from the rightful winner(s)? Who knows how widespread this corruption and fraud have become? Who knows if we'll ever again be able to have fair and honest elections?]"Statistical evidence establishes beyond reasonable doubt that 19,120 Presidential race ballots were destroyed by deliberate double-punching ballots in Palm Beach County FL with a 'second punch' for Al Gore or Pat Buchanan." "There is explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach [County]. These ballots show Democratic voter fraud . . . NOT Republican fraud or 'voter error' as publicized by the national media. Statistical evidence cannot prove any single ballot was tampered with, nor show which individual tampered with any single ballot. It can show specific places and times and methods where the fraud was done. (For example, if 15,000 dollars are missing from the register the day after your cashier left on a Los Vegas vacation, there is no direct evidence that the cashier stole the money. If, however, 19,120 dollars are missing from the register the next year when the cashier again leaves for vacation in Los Vegas, one has reason to investigate the cashier closely.)" "ONLY Palm Beach County Florida voters seem incapable of understanding and using this style of ballot. Palm Beach County has an error rate TEN TIMES larger than reported in ANY other county in the nation using paper punch ballots!" "ONLY in Palm Beach (and in ONLY the most heavily Democratic precincts) were 19,120 ballots rejected in 2000 for double punching. . . (This is a 4.4% error rate overall; in the rest of Florida there is less than 1/2 of ONE percent 'double punch' error rate!" "ONLY in Palm Beach did this 'double punch' error happen ONLY in the Gore-Bush-Buchanan selections for President. (In a truly random 'error,' the mistakes happen in every race, all at about the same rate. In Palm Beach, the massive errors -- over 19,000 -- ONLY happened in the Presidential race.)" "ONLY in Palm Beach did Gore GAIN 750 votes in a recount. In 50 out of 67 counties in FL, the actual change in the recount was 5-7 votes, and in 63 out of 67 counties, the total change was less than 30 votes either way. Further, in 63 out of 67 counties the 'changes' were somewhat evenly divided between ALL the candidates, in rough proportion to the original number of votes. This is the statistically expected result, and represents a true and legal recount of the ballots without any change in the ballots themselves." "Palm Beach [County] had an error rate in favor of Gore more than 120 TIMES greater than any other county. . . ." "In EVERY precinct in Palm Beach where Gore got more votes than there are registered Democrats, Bush received less than 60% of the registered Republican votes. In NO precinct in Palm Beach County did Bush receive more than 80% of the number of registered Republicans." "ONLY in Palm Beach did Bush receive LESS than 65% of the registered Republican voters. (Registered Republicans = 231,626 while Bush voters = 152,954.) On average, in every other county in FL Bush received MORE votes than there were registered Republicans." "Also, unique in the entire state, the percentage of Republican voters COUNTED as voting in Palm Beach was much less than normal, despite the pre-election attention to Florida as a critical state; and massive Republican get -out-the-vote campaigns." "ONLY in Palm Beach County do the smaller (Congressional) races outdraw the Presidential race." "ONLY in Palm Beach did Buchanan get less than HALF of the votes he received before in 1996." "There is a simple, single explanation for ALL of these 19,120 problems in ONE set of ballots in ONE district in ONE state." "15,000 Bush ballots, and 3,400 more Buchanan ballots, were double-punched to imitate a Gore vote, AFTER legitimate voters left their polling booth." "It is statistically impossible (odds of over 149 million to 1) to have ONE county out of 67 change its recount votes by over 900 votes if it is counting untainted, unaltered ballots, while the other 64 counties (using legal methods) change their recounts by less than 30 votes either way!" "Palm Beach County was one the last counties in Florida to release its voting results, and the Palm Beach County results were critical in a last minute 'surge' in Gore votes that reduced Bush's lead from 50,000 votes (in Florida overall) to less than 1500. Late delivery of votes, with the specific precinct vote count delayed until the required number of votes is known, is classic symptom of local election fraud. It DOES NOT prove fraud, but late delivery of vote results is the most common way of tampering with the vote, and is essential if ballot tampering is involved in the vote fraud. Late delivery of fraudulent votes has happened in several previous democratic elections at the national level, showing that the individuals involved had close knowledge of previous fraud and its successes." "Also, national democratic teams were in flight to Palm Beach immediately after midnight, again before the results were officially known to anyone. This indicates that democratic leaders at the precinct level (and thus the national level) knew about the 'confusion' (accidentally/incorrectly double-punched Buchanan ballots) BEFORE the Palm Beach votes were counted, and several hours before they were released to the Florida election officials." "Note too that this telemarketing campaign began before the Palm Beach results were announced. Before anyone (other than election officials) knew how any double-punched ballots existed, nor which ballot choices (for president) were double-punched." "Thus, there is a pattern not of massive error by the voters, but of continued fraud by the Democratic election committee members and local officials. Further indication of deliberate fraud is that there is no evidence of previous massive 'voter error' in Democratic primaries, Democratic runoff's, or Congressional races the past years." -- From Ballot Tampering and Voter Fraud in Palm Beach County by Robert A. Cook, PE. Posted here: 12-4-00.
"In March 1915 the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship-building, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations got together twelve men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These twelve men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest newspapers. The twenty-five papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." [Does anyone suppose a similar control is not exerted all across our national press today?]-- From a statement by Rep. Oscar Calloway in the Congressional Record, February 9, 1917, as quoted in Secret Records Revealed; The Men, the Money, and the Methods Behind the New World, by Dennis Laurence Cuddy, Ph.D., Hearthstone Publishing, Ltd., 1999, page 27. Address: 500 Beacon Drive, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73127. Phone: 405-789-3885. Toll free: 800-652-1144. Fax: 405-789-6502. Posted here: 11-27-00.
"[Federal law] 42 USC 666 (a)(13), also known as the Federal Child Support Enforcement Law, calls for the mandatory disclosure of your Social Security number in order for any person to obtain any licenses: (e.g. driver's, hunting, fishing, marriage, professional, business and occupational). This law became effective, Oct. 1, 2000. . . The purpose behind the mass collection of the Social Security numbers is to catch 'deadbeat' parents. . . . What this law is in essence telling us is that we are all 'potential' criminals until we come into the licensing agencies and have our Social Security number cleared of any wrongdoing. Don't be fooled by this backdoor attempt to register you or your possessions (e.g. guns)" [Professor Carroll Quigley in his 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope, stated that the individual's "freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits." (page 866, as quoted in the Emissary Publications Catalog -- Books, Tapes Videos -- 2000, page 20.)]-- From "Federal Child Support Enforcement Law Identifies 'Potential" Deadbeats," Media Bypass, November 2000, page 46. Alternative Media, Incorporated, 4900 Tippecanoe Drive, Evansville, Indiana 47715-3234. E-mail. Website. From an item posted at the Sierra Times website. Posted here: 11-20-00.
"Madeleine Albright, . . . and the rest of Clinton's friends have said repeatedly that one of the most dangerous things that we have in the world today is that America is too strong. Now if you have that mentality from the top, doesn't that suggest that it's OK for China to get our missile secrets; it's OK for Russia to plant bugs in the State Department; it's OK for spies to wander around? . . . This is their world-view. America is too strong, and we're a threat . . . . They don't care. It isn't because these people are stupid. They don't care." [This mentality may explain a whole lot of Clinton decisions of late, such as nationalizing U.S. land, favoring Castro over American interests, letting forest fires devastate the West, expanding U.N. power and influence, supporting the Kyoto treaty, favoring higher energy prices, encouraging the International Criminal Court, etc., etc., etc.]-- Retired FBI agent Gary Aldrich, as he stated in a June 26 interview with WorldNetDaily, as reported in "America the Corrupt," Discerning the Times, July 2000, page 4. Address: EPI Environmental Perspectives, Incorporated 1229 Broadway, Suite 313, Bangor, Maine 04401. Phone: 207-945-9878. See for yourself. Posted here: 11-13-00.
"Clinton's record: The first elected president in U.S. history to be impeached; first to be found guilty of a crime while still in office (leaking the private correspondence of Kathleen Willey in violation of the Privacy Act); first to be publicly accused of forcible rape; first to approve the sale of sophisticated weapons technology to a hostile power while its emissaries contributed to his campaign; first to be accused by multiple witnesses, including one under oath before a federal grand jury,of using cocain while he was the chief law enforcement officer of his state; first to be accused of sexual assault on White House property; first to order a paramilitary operation in which a network television camera crew was punched, kicked and forced to the ground at gunpoint to prevent them from broadcasting live video coverage; first to be the subject of a sexual harassment lawsuit; first to be held in contempt of court for lying under oath and fined by a federal judge; first sitting president to be named in a federal criminal referral as a possible witness to and beneficiary of fraudulent financial activity (Whitewater); first to consult with Congress about combat troop deployment while simultaneously receiving oral sex, according to Monica Lewinsky and Rep. Sonny Callahan (Starr Report -- September 1998); first to have two senior administration officials die violently under mysterious circumstances while they were being pressed for testimony on assorted White House scandals (Vince Foster, Ron Brown); first to have a major cooperating federal witness against him die in prison while waiting to give prosecutors the testimony they later admitted would have led to first family indictments (James McDougal); first to launch unprovoked missile attacks on two sovereign nations (Sudan, Afghanistan -- Aug. 20, 1998). . . ."-- From "Clinton Disbarment One of Many poresidnetial Firsts," by Carl Limbacher, Jr., Internet Vortex, August 2000, page 2. Address: Sequoia Digital Corporation, 224 Datura Street, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. Website. Posted here: 11-6-00.
"More and more Americans are coming to the chilling realization that U.S. membership in the United Nations poses a very real threat to our survival as a free and independent nation. Here are some good reasons to be concerned:-- From "The Truth About the United Nations!," Free American Newsmagazine, October 2000, pages 8-9. Address: US Highway 380, Box 2943, Bingham, New Mexico 87832. E-mail. Website. Posted here: 10-30-00.
"[T]he establishment of the World Court literally would make the U.S. Constitution null and void, through the overriding authority of foreign power. A nation's laws and protection of its nation will never be stronger than the ability of that nation to protect these from foreign intrusion. Never again, however, could one nation declare war on another nation, independent of the United Nations. The United States will never again be permitted to have a military, other than what is permitted and used by the U.N. When this is complete, the citizens of this nation may find themselves individually and collectively disarmed, without a military to protect us, and under a dictatorship which is absolute, unmerciful, and Godless. The International Criminal Court would seek out and punish those nations and /or individuals who would retain individual sovereignty or the power to defend themselves. One clearly realizes from reading the documents authorizing the formation of the International Criminal Court that once established, it will be a permanent, legal body, exercising crushing power over the rest of the world. . . ."-- From "The International Criminal Court," by Shirley Correll, Ph.D., The Florida Forum, Spring 2000, page 20. Address: Florida Pro-Family Forum, PO Box 1059, Highland City, Florida 33846-1059. Posted here: 10-23-00.
"Here then is the list of former members of Congress who were convicted or pleaded guilty to major offenses between 1992 and 1999 (it does not include lawmakers disciplined by Congress' own internal investigations, such as Newt Gingrich or Bob Packwood):"Mark Twain once observed that Congress was America's 'only native criminal class,' . . . ." -- From "Criminal Class," ("Inside the Beltway") by John McCalsin, The Washington Times National Weekly Edition, August 21 -27, 2000, page 6. Address: 3600 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20002. E-mail. Website. Posted here: 10-16-00.
"Former U.S. Marine Intelligence Col. Scott Ritter says the United Nations is about to make new weapons inspections demands upon Iraq. . . The move, he says, is little more than an election ploy by the Clinton administration to provoke an escalation of bombing. . . [S]aid Ritter, 'You have got a vice president, Al Gore, trailing behind in the polls, and what better way to appear tough and switch attention away to a so-called foreign threat.'""[T]he U.S.-led bombing campaign against Iraq is every bit as immoral as Hussein's wars against his neighbors and his own people. It's been going on for years. It results only in the senseless death of innocent Iraqis and increased hatred of America in a region of the world defined by such contempt. So why does Clinton do it? Because it serves a political purpose. It's a handy escape valve for him. It worked during the impeachment trial, and he's counting on it working again . . . ." "You've been warned, America. Your president is contemplating another evil war in your name. He's banking on you just going along -- even giving him and his chosen successor more support because the bombs are flying." -- From "Clinton's August Surprise," by Joseph Farah, WorldNet, August 2000, page 2. Address: PO Box 2450, Fair Oaks, California 95628. Phone: 916-852-6300. Fax: 916-852-6302. Website. Posted here: 10-9-00.
What has the U.N. been up to recently? Well, the just-completed United Nations Millennium Assembly in New York City has all but cemented plans that will change forever life in the United States and the entire world for that matter. Ex-Congressman John Rarick gives some examples:[You may think some or all of these examples of UN dominance are outlandish and extreme. You might be surprised to learn that many have already been implemented in U.S. policy. Don't expect to read about these sorts of things in the main-stream media.] -- "A Warning Regarding The United Nations Millennium Assembly," by Ex-Congressman John Rarick, The Florida Forum, Summer 2000, page 4. Address: PO Box 1059, Highland City, Florida 33846-1059. Posted here: 10-2-00.
"[T]he founding of America is replete with statements that neither liberty nor justice can survive without religion; yet religion is not to be controlled by the government. The founding of America is replete with statements that neither liberty nor justice can survive without strong and well-functioning families; yet the family is to remain a private, a sacredly private institution, protected but not controlled by the power of the law. This is the theme and the paradox of the American Revolution. Public institutions are necessary to the preservation of private rights. And so the government and the people, the public and the private, live in a tight relationship with each other, each dependent upon the other, each benefitting from the other."-- "Hillsdale and America," by Larry P. Arnn, president-elect, Hillsdale College, Imprimis, September 2000, pages 4-5. Address: Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242. Phone: 800-437-2268. Posted here: 9-25-00.
"If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have no federal meddling in our schools, no Federal Reserve, no U. S. membership in the United Nations, no gun control, and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor", no American troops in 100 foreign countries, no NAFTA, GATT, or "fast track", no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights, no attacks on private property, no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited."
This was stated in 1998 by Congressman Ron Paul from Texas.-- Congressman Ron Paul, 1998, as quoted in an e-mail from a friend. Thanks, Marilyn. Posted here: 9-18-00.
"During how many past Administrations have we been forced to watch a frightened boy violently ripped from the arms of his family and friends by the U.S. government, only to be returned to stranglehold of a Communist dictator? How many past presidential candidates have traded our precious, hard-won sovereignty to a national Communist power in exchange for campaign contributions? How many other Presidents have had an open door policy to Communist arms dealers and intelligence officers, or have turned the Lincoln bedroom into the 'best little whorehouse on Pennsylvania Avenue?' How many Vice Presidents have shoved their hands in the pockets of Buddhist nuns to extract the funds needed for the next campaign hit piece? How many Energy Secretaries have allowed our nuclear secrets to be lost, stolen and sold to the highest bidder, putting the entire nation at risk? How many other First Ladies have presided over the collection and misuse of private government files to manipulate, threaten, and intimidate political opponents? The answer to all of these questions is the same: none."-- From "JW: Cutting Off the Hand that Steals From You," by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch, June 2000, page 6. Address: 501 School Street, SW, Suite 725, Washington, DC 220024. Phone: 202-646-5172. Also: 888-JW-ETHIC. Fax: 202-646-5199. Website. Posted here: 9-11-00.
"To suppress human nature and human difference is, in essence, the Left's utopian ambition -- an ambition that requires the totalitarian state."Ever since the French Revolution, radical 'equality' and conservative 'liberty' have opposed each other as the defining agendas of Left and Right. For radicals, freedom is the power to redefine human destiny and has invariably meant the surrender of individual autonomy to the radical project, to collective truth and the 'progressive' idea. For conservatives, in contrast, liberty is relief for the individual from collective power. It is secured by 'negative rights,' by limits to government. Liberty is made possible by the civilizing bonds of social order, and restraints on the coercive power of civil authority." -- From The Politics of Bad Faith, by David Horowitz, 1998, pages 148-149. Address: The Free Press, A Division of Simon & Schuster, Incorporated, 1230 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020. Posted here: 9-4-00. Must-Read items for March-May 1999. June-August 1999. September-December 1999. January-April 2000. May-August 2000.  The way back home. |