For July-December 2002 Excerpts from writings of interest to all.
 The way back home. Send this page from You Don't Say to a friend.For those using Microsoft Internet Explorer: Select the "Mail" icon at the top of this window, then "Send Page." For those using Netscape: Select "File" at the top of this window, then "Send Page." |
"National security and safety should rank higher on our scale of priorities than tourism dollars, ethnic voting blocs, filling graduate universities with foreign students, low-wage workers for multinationals and agriculture, and kowtowing to liberal dogmas. Entry into the United States is a privilege, not a right, and the safety of our citizens is more important than the convenience of foreigners. . . ."Congress is pressured hard to do nothing [about the continuing influx of terrorists into America] by ethnicity lobbyists, big corporations, the travel industry, the universities, and open-borders activists, all of whom want to keep the flow of alien visitors coming into our country regardless of the national security danger. Our government regularly allows foreign students and visitors to overstay their visas. Our government has failed to implement an effective tracking system to monitor their whereabouts and order them to leave when their visas expire. . . . "The State Department is accepting this year's entries into the Diversity Visa Lottery program, which allows 50,000 lucky foreigners from non-Western (including terrorist-sponsored) countries to win permanent U.S. residency. This law is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever championed by Ted Kennedy. The Fourth of July murderer at the Los Angeles airport was in the United States because his wife won legal residence through this Diversity Visa Lottery Law. A good start on homeland security would be to repeal the Diversity Lottery. . . . "The change that 9/11 should have brought about (but hasn't yet) is our government's realization that national security requires us to repudiate the new religion whose gods are diversity and multiculturalism, and which decrees that profiling is the wost sin anyone can commit. Today there are nearly 1.5 million persons born in the Middle East living in the United States plus their 570,000 U.S.-born children. Thirty years ago, only 15% of Middle Eastern immigrants were Muslims; the rest were mostly Christians. Today, 3/4ths of Middle Eastern immigrants are Muslims." -- Excerpts from "America Must Choose: Open Borders or Civil Liberties," The Phyllis Schlafly Report, November 2002, pages 2-3. Address: PO Box 618, Alton, Illinois 62002. E-mail. Website.
"Just as the ground of the Founders' natural rights theory was a conception of human nature, the ground of the modern rejection of natural rights was a denial of human nature. . . ."If human beings are nothing on their own, it follows that they can do nothing on their own. Intelligence, talents, and virtues, as well as rights -- all the things the Founders said humans were born with -- must be produced by the social order. . . . "This theory reverses the relationship between the people and the government: rather than the people delegating power to the government, the government has to empower the people. . . The government of the New Deal in the 1930s worried about the needs and disabilities of workers, whereas today's government worries about the needs and disabilities of racial minorities, homosexuals, the disabled, and women. In all of these cases, the new role of government is to give those whom it considers most needy or disabled better treatment and others worse. "In short, the denial of human nature leads from an understanding of equality in terms of natural rights to an understanding of equality as something to be produced by government through unequal treatment. President Lyndon Johnson officially announced this new conception in a speech at Howard University in 1965: 'We seek . . . not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result. "To achieve 'equality as a result,' rights had to be redefined. Rather than being rightful claims to one's own possessions, rights in the new view are rightful claims to the resources of others. Thus, rather than speak as the Founders did of rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, Americans today speak of rights to housing and education and medical care and food stamps. In essence, 'rights' have come to mean that people who are not as hard working, as talented, or responsible, or as fortunate have rightful claims on the money and resources of others. "Two other differences between the Founders' and the modern liberal view of rights should be noted. First, according to the Founders, rights adhere to individuals, whereas rights today are customarily assigned according to group membership (blacks, women, farmers, students, the elderly, etc.). Second, rights today are assigned: they are not seen as existing prior to government, but as government gifts. "These two understandings are mutually exclusive. One of the clearest public admissions of this came from a 1987 Supreme Court case: A man sued a government agency that had give a job to a woman who was admittedly less qualified. Justice William Brennan, speaking for the court, asked 'whether the agency plan unnecessarily trammeled the rights of male employees' (emphasis added). His answer was no. In other words, modern liberals believe that it is perfectly acceptable for the government to trammel the rights of some citizens in order to give benefits to other citizens believed by government to be more worthy or more needy." -- Excerpts from The Rise and Fall of Constitutional Government in America, by Thomas G. West and Douglas A. Jeffrey, a 20-page booklet available (for $3.00) from the Claremont Institute (for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy), 250 West First Street, Suite 330, Claremont, California 91711. Phone: 909-621-6825. Fax: 909-626-8724. Website.
"[T]he Palestinian national movement is just a masquerade for the destruction of Israel."After their humiliating defeat by Israel in 1967, the Arabs changed tactics. They decided that the best approach to undermining the Jewish state was a long-term unconventional war. The 'Palestinians,' under the command of Moscow-trained Arafat, were more than happy to serve as the spear-carriers in that war of attrition. . . . "There was no serious movement for a Palestinian state. That movement was, and is, an invention of those who seek to destroy Israel. There is no other reason for the creation of an Arab state under Arafat than to destabilize Israel. . . . "The Arabs have built 261 settlements in the West Bank since 1967. Not much is aid about those settlements. But a great deal is heard about the number of Jewish settlements that have been created, how destabilizing they are, how provocative they are. Yet, by comparison, only 144 Jewish settlements have been built since 1967 -- including those surrounding Jerusalem, in the West Bank and tin Gaza. . . . "If Israel's policies make life so intolerable for Arabs, why do they continue to flock to the Jewish state? "Arabs outnumber Jews in the Middle East by a factor of about 100 to one. But how many of those hundreds of millions of Arabs are actually Palestinians? Not very many. . . . . "Arabs already control 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands, whereas Israel represents one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass. . . . "Despite the fact that there is nary a news story about Jerusalem that doesn't refer to it as the 'third holiest city in Islam,' it is just not true. In fact, the Koran says nothing about Jerusalem. It mentions Mecca hundreds of times. It mentions Medina countless times. It never mentions Jerusalem -- and with good reason. There is no historical evidence to suggest Mohammed ever visited Jerusalem. . . . "If Israel loses [the conflict], the Islamic revolution goes worldwide. The target is no longer Jerusalem. It's Washington. "So, whether you are concerned about the rising body count in the Mideast or not, this conflict will come home some day. . . This war is not about a little sliver of land on the West Bank of the Jordan River. It's about global power. It's about an expansionist vision that has shaped history for the last 1,200 years. This monster cannot be appeased. It can only be defeated." -- Excerpts from "Shattering the Myths of the Middle East," by Joseph Farah, Whistleblower, June 2002, pages 8-18. Address: PO Box 2450, Fair Oaks, California 95628. Phone: 916-852-6300. Fax: 916-852-6302. Website.
"A few decades ago Afrikaner farmers of South Africa exported enough food to feed all of the countries in the southern half of Africa. They built churches, schools, universities and hospitals and trained indigenous people to staff them. There was almost no unemployment. In 1994, under pressure of the U.S. and the U.N., the country was surrendered to the Communist-dominated African National Congress, run by black terrorists. Today the country is a basket case, with 40% unemployment, and the murder rate running at 27,000 a year. Black thugs and terrorists are invading white farms destroying crops, killing black farm workers and murdering white farmers and their families. Nearly 900 white farmers in 5,000 attacks have been killed since ANC rule began in 1994. In the old South Africa you could walk in complete safety anywhere in the downtown areas of the large cities with no fear at all. Now a woman is raped every 28 seconds. Doctors are fleeing in droves. Parks and beaches have become killing fields. At a recent public meeting young black hoodlums held up a banner proclaiming: 'Killing white Farmers Is Affirmative Action.' The silence of the Bush administration, the Tony Blair regime in England and all European governments is deafening (Report by Pastor Robert Slimp in Christian News, 5-21-01.)" [Ain't political correctness great!]-- Excerpt from "Who Are the Gods of the New World Order and What Is a Spiritual U.N.?" Part IV, by Shirley Correll, The Florida Forum, Spring 2001, page 8. Address: Florida Pro-Family Forum, PO Box 1059, Highland City, Florida 33846-1059.
"The complete transformation of the United States of America from its Judeo-Christian founding to a modern-day pagan paradise was delayed by just a few votes in the last presidential election."If you remember, we almost elected as our leader Al Gore, an irrational religious zealot, an earth worshipper, a neo-pagan. "That's the only way you can understand and explain Gore's wacko, counter-productive environmentalism. He's a prophet of a new religion. Actually, it's just a new spin on an old religion -- paganism, nature-worship or whatever else you want to call it. "Whether Gore is washed up or will make a political comeback is irrelevant. It's what Gore and so many others like him represent that's important -- the new politics, the new spiritualism, the new paganism of the 21st century.' "Read his book, Earth in the Balance, and you'll quickly agree Gore is a 'Chicken Little' preaching death and destruction unless we all get behind him as the leader of a new worldwide sect determined to make saving the planet 'the central organizing principle for civilization.' . . . "Truth is, Gore was not only unfit for the presidency, but you actually have to question his sanity. He is a fundamentalist fanatic -- a high priest of pop paganism. The fact that he won the votes of so many millions in 2000 is scary. . . . "The bad news is that, even without a pagan, goddess-worshipping commander in chief, America is rapidly changing from the jewel of Judeo-Christian Western Civilization to a screaming babel of wild religious movements, each more wacky than the next, and all animated by rebellion against the religion and values upon which America was founded, and which made it the greatest nation in world history." -- Excerpt from "A Nation Adrift," by Joseph Farah, Whistleblower, August 2002, pages 3, 44. Address: PO Box 2450, Fair Oaks, California 95628. Phone: 916-852-6300. Fax: 916-852-6302. Website.
"For close to an hour on October 3rd, private citizen Bill Clinton addressed the British Labor Party's annual conference in Blackpool, England. . . ."[W]hat Bill Clinton [said] earns him the distinctive label of anti-American. Identifying himself as a 'citizen of the world,' he repeatedly called for an 'integrated global community,' which would result if all join together 'to make the United Nations a more meaningful, more powerful, more effective institution.' . . . "Clinton's love for the UN dominated his remarks. He said the hope for 'a truly global community of people together in peace' didn't even materialize until 'the creation of the United Nations and the issuance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.' Abandoning his own nation's Declaration of Independence and its unambiguous assertion that man's 'unalienable rights' are given by 'their Creator,' he saluted the UN Declaration, which does not acknowledge God and boldly asserts that men's 'rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.' "It is obvious that Clinton opposes the very concept of independent nations, despite his solemn oath to 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.' Now that he is no longer seeking votes, he can boldly tell an audience in England that he is committed to the 'interests of the world' and to an 'integrated global community.' "Perhaps Bill Clinton is campaigning to become president of the world, maybe secretary-general of a beefed-up UN. If so, he should deliver his October 3rd speech worldwide. Its 'American Last' theme would win him friends among the many who both despise national independence and hate the United States." -- Excerpt from "'Citizen of the World' Clinton," by John F. McManus, The New American, November 4, 2002, page 44. Published by American Opinion Publishing Incorporated, 770 Westhill Boulevard, Appleton, Wisconsin 54914. Phone: 920-749-3784. Fax: 920-749-3785. E-mail. Website.
"Since January 22, 1973, the act of murdering tiny boys and girls, referred to as abortion, has been decriminalized. This act takes the life of an innocent person. This act is protected by the law."The United States Supreme Court, representing America's most authoritative body, charged with the task of meting out justice, has consistently endorsed the concept of a mother deciding whether or not she is with child or with problem. The Court sanctions her choice to have her child murdered by another person. "As a consequence, there is no justice for the innocent in the United States, even though the proper role of the judiciary, according to our Founding Fathers, is to defend the weak and protect the person from the unjust aggression of another human being. While some judges and lower courts make efforts to protect the vulnerable preborn, their decisions are regularly struck down by the high court. . . . "As Americans, we do not live in a just society where the rights of the innocent are protected from the vile acts of the evil. On the contrary, our legal system condones murder of the innocent and provides a shield of protection for the criminal and his accomplices; the abortionist and all those secondarily involved in the crime." -- From "Blind Justice," by Judie Brown, President, American Life League, Inc., Rutherford, Fall 2000, page 7. Address: The Rutherford Institute, PO Box 7482, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906. Phone: 804-978-3888. Fax: 804-978-1789. E-mail. Website.
"Shortly, some time in the next year, the U.S. will launch an all-out attack on Iraq designed to finish the war we should have finished a decade ago. The objective will be to hunt down Saddam Hussein and his inner circle and kill them all, while simultaneously locating and destroying his growing stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. Why?"Iraq has nuclear weapons and will be in a position to mass-produce them within a year. "Iraq has enormous stockpiles of biological weapons, most hidden beneath mosques and palaces. "Iraq has chemical weapons. "Iraq has delivery systems with a 650-kilometer range and, within two years, will be producing its own intercontinental ballistic missiles with a range of 3,000 kilometers. "Iraq has terrorists prepared to bring weapons of mass destruction into major cities in the United States and throughout the West. "According to my intelligence sources, Baghdad is waiting for the inevitable U.S. attack to launch its suicide bombers and missiles. "When the U.S. attacks, a new fiendish, apocalyptic wave of mass destruction and terrorism will begin. The longer the U.S. waits, the more the threat and Iraq's capabilities increase. "The attack on Iraq, when it comes, will be severe. It will involve hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops. It will make Afghanistan look like a tea party by comparison. It will make the Persian Gulf War look like a dress rehearsal. There will be heavy casualties. Iraq will be hit hard. Casualties will be heavy -- including civilians. There's no way around it. "This war will not involve just Iraq and the United States. Iran will be involved. Syria will be involved. Other Muslim states are likely to be involved. International terrorists will be unleashed from all corners of the earth. "And this war will also come home, my intelligence sources say. Suicide bombers are already here -- just waiting for their orders to deploy hand-carried weapons of mass destruction in the United States. Israel and Europe will also be hit hard." -- From "U.S. Iraq Attack and WWIII," by Joseph Farah, Whistleblower, September 2002, pages 28-29. Address: PO Box 2450, Fair Oaks, California 95628. Phone: 916-852-6300. Fax: 916-852-6302. Website.
"At Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where the military's special forces and paratroopers are trained, the Army has been ordered to protect all the trees in which endangered birds might now have or want to build [a] nest. Fort Bragg's 130,000 acres is covered with trees. That's what makes it an effective training facility for Special Forces. The protection order means trainees must keep away from all the trees."General George Keane, Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, reported to Congress that 'we have a 250 foot buffer ground each tree.' Solders cannot make noise in order to protect ['endangered' species] nests. Said General Keane, 'There can be no bivouacking or occupation for more than two hours at a time, no use of camouflage, no weapons fired other than 762 and 50 caliber blank ammunition, no use of generators or riot agents, no use of smoke grenades and no vehicles closer than 50 feet.' "Training for amphibious landing is severely controlled at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina because of beach restrictions during turtle-nesting season. In addition, a rare species of woodpecker makes inland training nearly impossible. "At Camp Pendleton, California, Marines aren't allowed to practice digging foxholes because environmental restrictions forbid it on the huge base. As a result, reports are now coming in from the combat zones in Afghanistan that Marines don't know how to dig foxholes. The Marine Corp spends about $20 million a year and employs a staff of environmental experts to be sure that it's in compliance on the 125,000 acre Camp Pendleton. "In short, America's military might is being diminished through the enforcement of radical environmental restrictions. The noose is being tightened by green ideologues armed with a political agenda rather than sound scientific reasoning. The end result, however, is an inadequately trained military, just as we are supposed to be preparing for a war with terrorism." -- From "The Green Betrayal of America's Military," by Tom DeWeese, The DeWeese Report, November 2002, page 1, published by the American Policy Center, 13873 Park Center Road, #316, Herndon, Virginia 20171. Phone: 703-925-0881. Fax: 703-925-0991. E-mail. Website.
"The best break a child can get is being born into a traditional family. Kids in single-parent homes are four times as likely to live in poverty as those in intact families."Children who grow up in a one-parent household are three times more likely to have a child out of wedlock, twice as likely to drop out of school, and far more apt to use drugs and engage in other antisocial behavior than their counterparts from two-parent families. . . . "Over the past 40 years, the news and entertainment industries have legitimized premarital sex, cohabitation and singly-parenting, while devaluing matrimony. "Human nature didn't change since the days of crew-cuts and 'Father Knows Best.' Young adults didn't wake up one morning and say, 'Hey, let's start living together!' Millions of adolescent girls didn't spontaneously decide to let adolescent boys sleep with them -- and damn the consequences. "It's all cultural conditioning. Try finding a traditional family on prime-time television today -- but be sure to take along a flashlight and a pack of bloodhounds. . . . "The Center for Media and Public Affairs reports that in the 1998-99 season, sexual content was featured once every four minutes on the networks and three times every four minutes on cable TV. Moreover, 98% of the time the sex depicted had no consequences -- physical or psychological. "Last year, NBC 'Dateline' did a segment about the media's effect on the way adolescents view sex. One 15-year-old boy stated: 'I don't think parents get the fact that they're up against a whole army. . . . Every person in the media is saying sex is OK and you should do it.'" -- From "Culture Is Culprit in Anti-Family Ethos," by Don Feder, Human Events, May 27, 2002, page 16. Address: 1 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001. Phone: 202-216-0600. Website.
"The globalists are constantly devising plans to lock the United States into a world government that erases national borders and diminishes national sovereignty. War, 'peacekeeping' escapades, and treaties are the means of incrementally achieving that goal."That was the lesson of Bill Clinton's 78 days of bombing of Yugoslavia -- a sovereign state that had never attacked another country. NATO was used as a vehicle since the bombing would have violated the United Nations Charter, which recognizes the sovereignty of nation-states. 'Human rights' provided the rhetoric to trump national sovereignty. "NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana boasted that the Yugoslav war moved us into 'a system of international relations in which human rights . . . are much more important than sovereignty.' Czech leader Vaclav Havel called the Yugoslav war 'an important precedent for the future' in which 'state sovereignty must inevitably dissolve.' "The globalists want to induce America to join European political, military, economic, and governmental bureaucracies in which the United States has only one vote. They already have conned us into joining the World Trade Organization where we have only one vote while the European Union has 15 votes and thus can easily manipulate the WTO's judicial system, which operates in secret. "Treaties play a major role in inducing the United States to submit to international regulations and monitoring. Every UN treaty would diminish U.S. sovereignty by interfering with self-government over some aspect of our lives, our business or our property. . . . "The globalists are trying to tell us that the ICC [International Criminal Court] really 'supports American values' and 'mirrors the Constitution.' That is false. U.S. constitutional protections against unfair prosecutions that are violated by the ICC include: (1) the right to trial by jury of one's peers (the most important protection), (2) the trial must be in the jurisdiction of the offense, (3) proof must be beyond reasonable doubt, (4) verdict for capital offenses must be unanimous, (5) warrants are necessary to seize and use evidence, (6) the state must provide exculpatory evidence, (7) compulsory process to obtain defense witnesses, and (8) the protection against double jeopardy (the ICC language is full of loopholes). "Senator Jesse Helms and Majority Whip Tom DeLay have tried valiantly to get Congress to pass the American Servicemembers' Protection Act to protect our troops from the ICC. This bill would cut off U.S. military aid to any country that ratifies the ICC, prohibit U.S. forces from participating in UN peacekeeping operations unless expressly immunized from ICC jurisdiction, and authorize the President to take any means 'necessary and appropriate' to free U.S. servicemenbers from ICC captivity. Versions of this bill have passed both Houses of Congress and been endorsed by the Bush Administration, but it has not yet become law because of opposition by the Democrats." -- From "The Many Assaults on U.S. Sovereignty," The Phyllis Schlafly Report, June 2002, pages 2-3. Address: PO Box 618, Alton, Illinois 62002. E-mail. Website.
"Part of the reason liberals prefer invective to engagement is that . . . if Americans knew what they really believed, the public would boil them in oil."Liberals have been wrong about everything in the last half-century. "They were wrong about Stalin (praised in the New York Times and known as 'Uncle Joe' to Franklin Roosevelt). They were wrong about Reagan (won the Cold War and now polling as the greatest president of the twentieth century). They were wrong about the Soviet Union (defeated by the twentieth century's greatest president). They were wrong even about their precious 'Abraham Lincoln brigade' in the Spanish Civil War (the disgorging of Soviet archives proves that the Lincoln brigade was part of 'a rigidly controlled Soviet operation') They were wrong about Nicaragua (communist dictatorships in Latin America turned out not to be 'inevitable revolutions,' after all). They were wrong about welfare (since overhauled by Republicans to notable success). They were wrong about crime (Giuliani's achievement is evident in the number of candidates who promise to continue his policies). They were wrong about social security (now bankrupt). They were wrong about the Civil Rights Act (which was never going to be used as an instrument of discrimination against whites). They were wrong on the sexual revolution (witness the explosions of AIDS, herpes, chlamydia, hepatitis B, and abortion). "It is not an accident that, today, the left's single biggest cause is 'global warming.' This time, conservatives won't be able to prove them wrong for a thousand years." -- From Slander, by Ann Coulter, 2002, page 197. Address: Crown Publishers, Member of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Incorporated, New York, New York. Website.
"At first the One Worlders had little success. America was only the second nation in history whose basic law was the law of God. The Bible was quoted as THE LAW in court, in Congress and throughout society. The Bible was the final arbiter in most disputes. Most Americans had their priorities straight. They understood the God-given chain of governmental authority: (1) God, the Creator; (2) Man, the creation of God; (3) The Constitution, the creation of man; (4) Civil government, and (5) Public Servants. This basic governmental structure survived until the advent of Franklin Roosevelt and his humanistic/socialistic 'New Deal' in 1933."Since that fateful date the basic structure of American civil government has been turned completely upside down. Civil government (the State) has steadily exalted itself above all, and has now declared itself to be 'god' -- the one which will provide for all its fawning subjects from the womb to the tomb, with as little inconvenience as possible. "The Creator God has been removed from the halls of government, the nation's classrooms, and most of its churches. The Constitution, though paid lipservice to, has been scrapped. Most Americans have been seduced/induced into accepting the diabolical humanist dogma that they evolved from slime. Having lost their position under God by default, they now grovel at the feet of their new Lord and Master, the State." -- From "A Revolution in Peaceful Guise," by Des Griffin Emissary Publications, Summer 2002, page 21. Address: PMF? #1776, 9205 SE Clackamas Road, Clackamas, Oregon 97015. Fax: 503-824-2050.
"Vaccination and water fluoridation have something in common: Proponents of these forms of mass medication justify our one-size-fits-all exposure to them by publically proclaiming benefits that cannot be supported in science. The benefits are also not supported in field experience: Incidence of infectious and chronic disease is more common among vaccinated populations and tooth decay is more prevalent in communities that drink fluoridated water."So, neither fluoridation nor vaccination accomplish their stated objectives -- no matter how militantly they are forced into our bodies. The problem is worsened by other ill-effects of these government mandated policies: Vaccines are catalysts in the development of autism and other learning and developmental/sociopathic anomalies and the onset of chronic autoimmune dysfunction diseases and death; fluoride is a cumulative metal neurotoxin that is carcinogenic, mutagenic, immunosuppressive and makes bones brittle. "The logical question is: 'If people receive no benefit from substances to which they are exposed by government mandate, then who receives the benefit?'" -- From "The Two Biggest Medical Hoaxes in History Are Sold to You in Packages of Lies," The Idaho Observer, May 13, 2002, page 2. Address: PO Box 457, Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869. Phone: 208-255-2307. Fax: 208-255-2607. E-mail. Website.
"[T]he UN is using American tax dollars to underwrite a bizarre religious movement -- the Cult of Gaia. This belief in an 'Earth spirit,' goddess or planetary brain, is just as dangerous to the American way of life as radical Islam. . . ."In order to protect Gaia . . . the U.S. has to be prohibited from certain uses of the world's natural resources. This is the true meaning of 'sustainable development.' Various UN environmental treaties on 'global warming' and other matters have been implemented to bring this about. "This cult, which combines aspects of the animal rights and radical environmentalist movements, holds that human beings, especially Americans, are exploiting the Earth for selfish purposes. They believe we use too much energy and consume too much. The concept of 'sustainable development' is designed to punish America for our economic success and to transfer our wealth to the rest of the world. They want global taxes to accomplish this. "The religious overtones of this movement are too obvious to ignore. Rep. Helen Chenoweth described this phenomenon as 'environmental religion' and says that it has 'profound constitutional implications' because of the First Amendment prohibition on government establishment of religion. Columnist Alston Chase, a reformed environmentalist, agrees, warning that 'It may be only a matter of time before America becomes a complete theocracy -- a place where, in the name of environmentalism, science and religion fuse with civil authority to rule the populace.'" -- From "The UN's Cult of Gaia," by Cliff Kincaid, Media Bypass, September 2002, page2 32-33. American Alternative Media LP, 4900 Tippecanoe Drive, Evansville, Indiana 47715-3234. E-mail. Website.
"State governments and the federal courts are separately assuming the power to forcibly drug American citizens. The details are shocking."The federal Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently ordered dentist Dr. Charles Sell, charged but never tried or convicted of Medicaid fraud, to be drugged against his will. In a split 2-1 decision, the Court gave a government psychiatrist unlimited power to inject any type and quantity of mind-altering drugs into Dr. Sell. "The Court authorized these forcible injections on the basis of unproven allegations of a non-violent crime. The traditional rule 'innocent until proven guilty' was replaced by 'drugged until proven innocent.' "The government claims it needs to drug Dr. Sell in order to try him, even though he has already served more time than his possible punishment. How can our government require mind-altering medication of citizens presumed to be innocent when we don't even allow government to require citizens to recite the pledge of allegiance to the flag?" -- From "Forced Drugging by Government," by Phyllis Schlafly, Citizens Informer, May-June 2002, page 23. Address: PO Box 221683, St. Louis, Missouri 63122. Phone: 225-338-9763. E-mail. Website.
"At the heart of the environmental-Green movement have been people who are hardcore Marxists, haters of Capitalism and the corporations and countless small businesses that sustain it. Their problem, however, is that Communism doesn't work. In addition, it has a record of having enslaved and killed millions of people who fell under its control. . . ."Humanity is not high on the list of priorities for the Greens who thrive on programs that kill large numbers of people deprived of pesticides to protect them against nature's greatest vectors of disease, insect and rodent pests. Deprive farmers of the pesticides and herbicides needed to protect their crops against these predators. Deprive people of electrical power from non-polluting hydroelectric dams or nuclear utilities. And, most importantly, deprive people of a voice in their affairs through democratic elections by destroying the sovereignty of nations." -- From "The Green Plan for World Domination," by Alan Caruba, The DeWeese Report, September 2002, page 8, published by the American Policy Center, 13873 Park Center Road, #316, Herndon, Virginia 20171. Phone: 703-925-0881. Fax: 703-925-0991. E-mail. Website.
"Intimidated by interest group politics, Republicans are deserting their principles. Ever since federal bureaucrats and judges illegally and unconstitutionally created race and gender privileges in the name of civil rights, many Americans have been patiently waiting for Republicans to reaffirm equality in law."Equality in law means that government cannot favor groups by granting status-based privileges. Its opposite is equality of result, which is achieved by treating people differently. "Policies designed to achieve equality of result, such as race and gender quotas, contravene the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and are illegal under the statutory language of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. . . . "If Republicans desert a principle-based constituency, how will the party fare in political competition? Can Republicans outbid Democrats in promising privileges to preferred minorities and benefits to the poor? Are Republicans acquiescing to the liberals' morality that the only just policy is to redistribute income and power to the oppressed?" -- From "Republicans Are Losing Their Constituency," by Paul Craig Roberts, Middle America News, July 2002, page 21. Address: We the People Institute, Incorporated, PO Box 17088, Raleigh, North Carolina 27619. Phone: 919-839-1001. Fax: 919-839-2181. E-mail. Website.
". . . Italian Communist theoretician Antonio Gramsci . . . understood that the creation of the total state requires the seizure of the 'mediating institutions' that insulate the individual from the power of the government -- family, organized religion, and so forth -- and a systematic redefinition of the culture in order to sustain the new political order. The battle cry of Gramsci's disciplines is: 'Capture the culture!' . . ."The success of the Gramscian cultural assault upon American was attested to by Michael Walzer in the Winter 1996 issue of the Marxist journal Dissent. As evidence that the revolutionary left is winning the 'Gramcian war of position,' Walzer approvingly cited, among other developments: 'The visible impact of feminism.'"All of these developments, Walzer admitted, were imposed upon our society by 'liberal elites,' rather than being driven 'by the pressure of a mass movement or a majoritarian party.' These changes, Walzer observed, 'reflect the leftism or liberalism of lawyers, judges, federal bureaucrats, professors, school teachers, social workers, journalists, television and screen writers -- not the population at large.'" -- From "A Method to the Madness," by William Norman Grigg, The New American, October 23, 2000, pages 10-11. Published by American Opinion Publishing Incorporated, 770 Westhill Boulevard, Appleton, Wisconsin 54914. Phone: 920-749-3784. Fax: 920-749-3785. E-mail. Website.
"Today, the U.S. legal system has been laid low by: a great profusion of law and regulation, much of which is contradictory; class action and plaintiff civil suits that blame deep pocket defendants for the plaintiffs' mistakes; unscrupulous prosecutors who abuse their powers; asset freeze and forfeiture laws that have destroyed the security of property; and Benthamite legal influences that have stripped away the individual's protections, which were once the glory of the Anglo-American legal system."Today, not even lawyers know what the law is. This is due not only to the law's sheer bulk, but also to the ability of prosecutors and regulators to create law on the spot by interpreting statutes and regulations to suit their purposes. In effect, law has become a kind of silly putty out of which prosecutors and police fashion bills of attainder. "Most 'white collar crimes' are based on nothing more than the fact that a businessman or his attorney interpreted a complex regulation differently from the way a regulator or prosecutor chose to interpret it in order to bring charges. "Can law become more arbitrary than this? Mexico and China, where difficulties that arise can be handled with a bribe or a political understanding, have fewer legal unknowns and risks than the United States. There is ample evidence that the once-vaunted U.S. legal system has lost its worth. Look at the number of U.S. corporations that are moving production and R&D to China, and the number of firms that are reorganizing as offshore foreign entities." -- From "U.S. Law Is an Absurdity," by Paul Craig Roberts, Middle America News, July 2002, page 21. Address: We the People Institute, Incorporated, PO Box 17088, Raleigh, North Carolina 27619. Phone: 919-839-1001. Fax: 919-839-2181. E-mail. Website.
"The early titans of the 'abortion-rights' movement determined that the way to win the hearts and minds of Americans was literally to reframe the debate away from the real issue of destroying the unborn, and instead to focus on nonsensical but powerfully compelling emotional catch-phrases like 'a woman's right over her body' and 'freedom of choice.' In the same way, homosexual public relations and marketing professionals like After the Ball authors Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen charted a sophisticated, long-term marketing campaign -- eschewing any references to what homosexuals actually do -- that would gradually win over the hearts and minds of Americans. They have succeeded, no doubt beyond their wildest expectations."Today, in every area of life -- culture, entertainment, law, the news media, education, even the church -- homosexual strides have been nothing less than staggering. In what was once a Judeo-Christian culture, Christians and other proponents of traditional biblical principles are routinely cast as bigots and 'homophobes.' Meanwhile, homosexuals, once condemned as both corrupted and corrupting, are today honored, idealized, defended as victims and celebrated as heroes and role models. . . . "When all is said and done, homosexuals who go after young, straight boys -- whether they are priests or Boy Scout leaders or baseball coaches or whoever -- know, consciously or unconsciously, that they may well be putting their young 'partner' on the road to homosexuality. They are planting a seed in that fertile ground that has a good chance of taking root and producing more of their kind. "The other reason they are attracted to young, straight people -- and this they share with heterosexual child molesters -- is that there is a satisfaction for deeply corrupted people in corrupting others. In a bizarre way, it feels like completion, vindication, triumph, victory. It reaffirms the rightness of what they have become, and removes the painful contrast of innocence. "When all is said and done, the destruction of innocence is what homosexual lust for boys is all about." -- From "Gay Rights' Secret Agenda," by David Kupelian, Whistleblower, July 2002, page 49. Address: PO Box 2450, Fair Oaks, California 95628. Phone: 916-852-6300. Fax: 916-852-6302. Website.
"Many times the question has been asked, 'How could the world have stood by and allowed Adolph Hitler to build his massive Nazi war machine that would eventually throw the world into chaos?'"Answer: The same way we are today allowing it to happen to Communist China. . . . "We know the Chinese are preparing for world domination, yet we continue to build their treasury by importing goods and supplying them with vital tools needed to build weapons and defense systems that they intend to use against us. . . . "The Chinese make an international incident out of a collision with an American plane which they caused. They took the plane and held the crew until they were satisfied that the U.S. had been sufficiently humbled. Our response? Congress voted to grant the Chinese 'permanent normal trade relations,' a position the Chinese had to have in order to be awarded membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO). China won membership in November. . . . "[I]f the U.S. government continues to build the strength of our enemy -- then one day soon it may be the United States that faces the prospects of being 'bombed back to the stone age.' A world dominated by the Communist Chinese is the most horrifying scenario one can imagine. Osama is a pussycat compared to them." -- From "America Is Helping to Build a New Terrorist Nation," by Tom DeWeese, Media Bypass, July 2002, page 9. Alternative Media, Incorporated, 4900 Tippecanoe Drive, Evansville, Indiana 47715-3234. E-mail. Website.
"President Truman obtained UN authorization to send troops into Korea in 1950. Three presidents sent troops to Vietnam citing authority derived from SEATO, a UN subsidiary. George Bush (the elder) blatantly told Congress he didn't need its authority to attack Iraq in 1991 because he obtained authorization from the UN. And the current President Bush sought and obtained UN Authorization to wage a war on terrorism. . . ."One seeks authority from a superior, not from an inferior. A succession of presidents -- with increasing congressional acquiescence -- has effectively acknowledged that the UN is our nation's superior. Although few will admit it, most Americans have accepted this arrangement, and, even more outrageously, so has the overwhelming majority in Congress. . . . "[O]nce our nation joined NAFTA, its officials required changes in our regulations dealing with inspection of trucks entering the U.S. from Mexico. NAFTA, therefore, has become our superior. "Likewise, entry into the World Trade Organization has resulted in surrendering more U.S. sovereignty. One indication of this transfer of independence occurred when the WTO ruled against America's tax policies. Congress has meekly accepted WTO superiority. "With these precedents in mind, consider that the UN's ICC claims judicial power over every person on Earth. And the world body's campaign against private weapons ownership is hardly a secret. How can America refuse to submit to these UN designs? . . . . "The bottom line is clear: For anyone who believes in national sovereignty and personal freedom, there can be no course other than to have our country withdraw completely from the United Nations." -- From "Submitting to UN Authority," by John F. McManus, The New American, June 3, 2002, page 44. Published by American Opinion Publishing Incorporated, 770 Westhill Boulevard, Appleton, Wisconsin 54914. Phone: 920-749-3784. Fax: 920-749-3785. E-mail. Website.
"What is Sustainable Development? Imagine an America in which a specific ruling principle is created to decide proper societal conduct for every citizen. That principle would be used to consider everything you eat, what you wear, the kind of home you live in, the way you get to work, the way you dispose of waste, the number of children you may have, even your education and employment decisions. Imagine, too, that all of these decisions are called 'voluntary,' but the White House Administration ruling over the vast apparatus of the federal government would use its full power to induce what it deems 'correct behavior.'"On June 29, 1993, [then] President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order #12852 to create the President's Council on Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development is the 'ruling principle' for the implementation of what . . . Vice President Al Gore said we must all suffer through in order to purify our nation from the horrors of the Twentieth Century's industrial revolution. In his book, Earth in the Balance, Gore called it a 'wrenching transformation of society.' "Consequently, Sustainable Development calls for changing the very infrastructure of the nation, away from private ownership and control of property to nothing short of a national zoning system. In such a system, the federal government, backed by an army of private, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), like the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood and the National Education Association will influence, if not dictate, policy in state government and in local communities. Locally-elected officials will no longer be the single driving force in making decisions for their communities. Most will be done behind the scenes in non-elected 'sustainable councils' armed with truckloads of federal regulations, guidelines and money." -- From "New River -- Same Old Land Grab," by Tom DeWeese, The DeWeese Report, July 2002, page 1, published by the American Policy Center, 13873 Park Center Road, #316, Herndon, Virginia 20171. Phone: 703-925-0881. Fax: 703-925-0991. E-mail. Website.
"On February 9, 1915, Congressman Oscar Colloway entered the following statement in the Congressional Record: '[T]he J.P. Morgan [Rothschild] interests . . . got together twelve men high up in the newspaper world, and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient numbers of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These men worked the problem out by selecting 179 . . . . [B]y an elimination process . . . they found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest newspapers. . . ."'[A]n editor was furnished to each paper to properly supervise and edit information . . . and other things of a national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers. . . .'" "Though unrecognized by most, what we see unfolding before us is the cold-blooded, systematic destruction of the American Dream. What we are witnessing is the working out of the Illuminati Master Plan for the abolition of the Old World Order and the construction of a New World Order. That Plan was devised and laid out by Adam Weishaupt, doctor of Canon Law at Ingolstadt University, Bavaria, some 226 years ago when he formed the Illuminati (The Order of the Enlightened Ones). As Sir Walter Scott shows in The Life of Napoleon, the plot was financed by financiers centered in Frankfurt. These later became known as the International Bankers. "The Luciferian philosophy which inspired the Master Plan calls for the fulfillment of seven basic goals: (1) The destruction of Christianity; (2) The abolition of private property; (3) The abolition of inheritance; (4) The breakup of the family unit; (5) The destruction of patriotism; (6) the abolition of all sovereign national governments, and (7) The creation of a New World Order -- or One World Government (Proofs of a Conspiracy, by Professor John Robison, 1797)."These goals were to be accomplished by a two-pronged worldwide movement, both prongs being directed and financed by the international bankers. On one side was Bolshevism (later known as Communism) which would, by force, conquer and control the backward nations of the world. On the other side was Fabian Socialism which would concentrate on the gradual takeover of the developed nations (America, Britain, Canada, etc.) through the infiltration of their control mechanisms -- politics, education, religion, media, etc. -- by specially trained change agents. Their activities would, in turn and in time, result in the development of new converts and thus lead to the takeover of the civil government on all levels -- local, state, and national. This would inevitably result in their governing the affairs of each country. It was ultimately planned to combine the results achieved by both sides and thus create the desired New World. Order." -- From "A Revolution in Peaceful Guise," by Des Griffin, Emissary Publications, Summer 2002, pages 20-21. Address: PMB: #1776, 9205 SE Clackamas Road, Clackamas, Oregon 97015. Fax: 503-824-2050.  Must-Read items for March-May 1999. June-August 1999. September-December 1999. Must-Read items for January-April 2000. May-August 2000. September-December 2000. Must-Read items for January-June 2001. July-December 2001. January-June 2002. The way back home. |
